Wednesday, November 28, 2007
« Science Articles about DNA from the NYT... | Main | The Politics of Passion, Women's Sexual ... »
Complainant accuses Respondents of "typosquatting," intentionally registering a domain name that is identical to its mark but for a simple typographical error.

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center

 

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION

Google, Inc. v. Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff

Case No. D2001-0060

 

1. The Parties

Complainant is Google, Inc., a California (USA) corporation, 2400 Bayshore Parkway, Mountain View, California USA, represented by Julia Anne Matheson of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner of Washington, DC USA (the Complainant).

Respondents are Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff, both of 3003 West Stovall Street, Tampa, Florida USA (the Respondents).



Planning to buy a Domain Name? You Better Have an Exit Plan for when you no longer want the domain!
Dead Ed Dots Need To Be Buried With Dignity An Educators Professional Responsibility to make sure their web site doesn't end up as P0rn. [See CyberSquatting]


Who Owns that Website Domain Name?

DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES & RESOLUTION



Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:56:02 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)    Disclaimer  |   |  Related posts:
Fair Use The Google Scholar service has been extended so that users can choose to search legal opinions and journals for information that they need.
Tweet Black Friday Deals
How do you Upgrade Planet Earth by Marcus Ranum
Microsoft's Bing search engine has a vulnerability with its cash-back promotion, which impacts both merchants and customers.
Barak Obama's half brother is Jewish
Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad.