Tuesday, November 25, 2008
« DEMAND and EDUCATION for Afganistan GIRL... | Main | ECP NetHappenings News and Headlines »
from reader Amy Sosnov Esq.

NJ bar Daily Briefing - 11/24/2008
THIRD CIRCUIT: PARENTS CAN'T SUE UNDER NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT

Parents have no private right to sue under the federal No Child Left Behind Act,
the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday in the first federal appellate
decision on the issue. The suit, Newark Parents Association v. Newark Public Schools,
charged that Newark school officials violated the law's requirements that parents be
notified of their children being enrolled in deficient schools or of their right to transfer
from failing schools to nonfailing schools or to demand supplemental educational services.
The court agreed with U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton that only the federal
government can enforce the act.

Parents have no right to sue under the federal No Child Left Behind Act because Congress designed
the law only to regulate school districts and never included any "rights creating" language that would
allow individuals to seek enforcement through lawsuits, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

The decision Thursday in Newark Parents Association v. Newark Public Schools marks the first time
that a federal appellate court has refused to recognize a private cause of action under the NCLB.

But U.S. Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry found that numerous federal district courts have addressed
the issue and were unanimous in holding that the law "does not confer a right of action enforceable by individuals."



In the suit, a proposed class of parents and children complained that a high percentage of Newark’s
schools have been labeled as failing or "in need of improvement," but that Newark school officials
violated the law's requirements that parents be notified of: the fact that their children were enrolled
in deficient schools; their right to transfer from failing schools to nonfailing schools; or their right to
demand "supplemental educational services."

In the appeal, attorneys Scott M. Michelman of the American Civil Liberties Union, along with professor
Emily B. Goldberg of Seton Hall Law School argued that U.S. District Judge Susan D. Wigenton of the

District of New Jersey erred in dismissing the suit by failing to recognize that the parents were

demanding only that the law's notice provisions be honored.

Barry disagreed, saying the lower court correctly found there was no implied cause of action.

"Only the Secretary of Education can enforce a state's violation of the act," Barry wrote in an
opinion joined by Judges Thomas L. Ambro and Kent A. Jordan.

"The overall structure of the act supports the conclusion that Congress did not intend to confer
enforceable individual rights," Barry wrote. Attorney Adam S. Herman of the Newark Public Schools
office of general counsel argued the appeal for the school district.

 

Third Circuit Case Management and Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) - (Available for Filing December 15, 2008)

Opinions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 1:08:41 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)    Disclaimer  |   |  Related posts:
The Bipartisan Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act Needs Your Support!
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters Native Village
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters Awards and Scholarships for Creative Teens
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters Education News Parents Can Us
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters reauthorizing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters ARRA education grants and their allocations