from reader Amy Sosnov Esq.NJ bar Daily Briefing - 11/24/2008
THIRD CIRCUIT: PARENTS CAN'T SUE UNDER NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
Parents have no private right to sue under the federal No Child Left Behind Act,
the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday in the first federal appellate
decision on the issue. The suit, Newark Parents Association v. Newark Public Schools,
charged that Newark school officials violated the law's requirements that parents be
notified of their children being enrolled in deficient schools or of their right to transfer
from failing schools to nonfailing schools or to demand supplemental educational services.
The court agreed with U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton that only the federal
government can enforce the act.
Parents have no right to sue under the federal No Child Left Behind
Act because Congress designed
the law only to regulate school districts
and never included any "rights creating" language that would
allow
individuals to seek enforcement through lawsuits, the 3rd U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals has ruled.
The decision Thursday in Newark Parents Association v. Newark Public Schools marks the first time
that a federal appellate court has refused to recognize a private cause of action under the NCLB.
But U.S. Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry found that numerous
federal district courts have addressed
the issue and were unanimous in
holding that the law "does not confer a right of action enforceable by
individuals."
In the suit, a proposed class of parents and children complained
that a high percentage of Newarkâs
schools have been labeled as failing
or "in need of improvement," but that Newark school officials
violated
the law's requirements that parents be notified of: the fact that their
children were enrolled
in deficient schools; their right to transfer
from failing schools to nonfailing schools; or their right to
demand
"supplemental educational services."
In the appeal, attorneys Scott M. Michelman of the American Civil
Liberties Union, along with professor
Emily B. Goldberg of Seton Hall
Law School argued that U.S. District Judge Susan D. Wigenton of the
District of New Jersey erred in dismissing the suit by failing to
recognize that the parents were
demanding only that the law's notice
provisions be honored.
Barry disagreed, saying the lower court correctly found there was no
implied cause of action.
"Only the Secretary of Education can enforce a
state's violation of the act," Barry wrote in an
opinion joined by
Judges Thomas L. Ambro and Kent A. Jordan.
"The overall structure of the act supports the conclusion that
Congress did not intend to confer
enforceable individual rights," Barry
wrote. Attorney Adam S. Herman of the Newark Public Schools
office of
general counsel argued the appeal for the school district.
Third Circuit Case Management and Electronic
Case Files (CM/ECF) - (Available for Filing December
15, 2008)