Sunday, January 25, 2009
« Obama will build the electric grids and... | Main | [ECP] K-12 NewsLetters From Martin Luth... »
Sorting Children Into 'Cannots' and 'Cans' Is Just Racism in Disguise
By Jay Mathews
Monday, January 19, 2009; B02

Tomorrow marks a turning point in the history of our schools as well as our
country. Note how the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., whom we honor today, had to
confront the cold, hard, in-your-face prejudice of a legally segregated
system, while the next president, Barack Obama, speaks of a softer negligence,
illuminated by the frequently heard phrase, "These kids can't learn."
These days, those of us interested in schools -- parents, students,
educators, researchers, journalists -- are not sure if we believe in teaching or
sorting. Is it best to strain ourselves and our children trying to raise everyone to
a higher academic level, or does it make more sense to prepare each child for
a life in which he or she will be comfortable? The people I admire in our
schools want to be teachers. Sorting, they say, is a new form of the old racism
but subtler and in some ways harder to resist.
It took me a long time to understand this. My parents were socially
conservative but politically and religiously liberal, and they raised me in the United
Church of Christ, the same denomination that Obama and his family joined in
Chicago. There were few black people in our pews in San Mateo, Calif., however.
My public high school had only two black students, my private college not many
more. The first African Americans I got to know well were in my Army basic
training company. They teased me, the only college graduate in the barracks,
about my utter lack of street smarts. They had not done well in school, but they
were shrewd, energetic and learned quickly, once subjected to the Army's
refusal to tolerate inattention. Many went to college when they finished their
service.
Years later, when I began writing about urban public schools' failure to do
the same for the clever students in their classrooms, some readers objected.
Those minority children, they said, were permanently handicapped by a cultural
and genetic heritage that would always hold them back. These critical calls and
e-mails became more frequent after "The Bell Curve," a 1994 bestseller that
alleged racial differences in intelligence. Readers asked why I was ignoring
these insights.
Because I had been with The Washington Post almost my entire working life,
the answer seemed obvious. Every day, I encountered literate, wise and
productive journalists who happened to trace their ancestry back to Africa. It was, and
still is, a newspaper full of Barack and Michelle Obamas. As editors, they
made my stories much better. As writers, they showed me how much I could achieve
if I emulated their love of depth and detail. We had lots of fine journalists
of other races, too, but the black ones were my best arguments for rejecting
the notion that academic success was tied to race.
What practical use, I asked my critics, is the idea that black people on
average might not have IQ scores as high as white people? Intelligence tests had
been shown to be very flawed measures, particularly of children. A child who
learned could raise his IQ. How was a teacher to know if a black third-grader
with a reading problem was going to grow up to be a security guard or a Pulitzer
Prize winner? The educator's job was not to make assumptions about what lives
they would have, but help them improve their skills as much as possible.
I didn't convince many people. The sorting instinct seems part of our DNA,
that tribal primate urge to know where everyone is in the pecking order. I find
it in every school I visit. It lives on in my friends, my family and myself.
Selective colleges, prestigious law firms, grant funders -- they all sort. When
demand is greater than supply, there is not much else you can do in those
situations. But that fact is too often adopted by educational gatekeepers as an
excuse for not doing their jobs, which is to teach.
Most American high schools (except in the Washington area, thank goodness)
admit only A or strong B students to Advanced Placement classes, when many
less-advanced or later-maturing students would benefit from exercising their
intellectual muscles in a challenging course. Gifted programs, magnet programs, even
student clubs sometimes screen applicants more than is healthy for the
mission of giving everyone the educations they deserve. Some of our best teachers
measure themselves by how many top students they have in their classes, not how
many struggling students they help become better.

Most of us, for humane reasons, think it is best that people choose lives
that fit. That is why the sons and daughters of house cleaners are advised to take
vocational courses and why impoverished children are less often encouraged to
take the SAT than are affluent children. This notion of a place for everyone
was used by defenders of slavery before the Civil War and of Jim Crow
after
it, but we never think of it that way. We say we don't want to put unneeded
stress on children who can't handle it.

In this new era, which will win: teaching or sorting?
I am not sure. I have written a book, coming out this week, about two of the
most successful teaching advocates I know, Mike Feinberg and Dave Levin. Their
story is full of obstacles, setbacks and heartbreaks. They had to break many
rules, and a few laws, to create the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP), a
network of 66 schools, mostly public charters, in 19 states and the District.
Eighty percent of the students in these schools come from families poor enough to
qualify for federal lunch subsidies, and 95 percent are black or Hispanic.
The results are impressive. A sample of 1,000 eighth-graders who attended
KIPP schools for four years on average went from the 32nd to the 60th percentile
in reading and from the 40th to the 82nd in math.
Gains that great for that
many impoverished children in one program have never happened before. They are
part of an informal movement including many veterans of the Teach for America
program who have made similar progress with such organizations as Achievement
First, Aspire, Edison, Green Dot, IDEA, Imagine Schools, Noble Street and
Uncommon Schools. But their numbers are small, and their critics large and
powerful.
Barack Obama the community organizer was one of their models, but Obama the
44th president will have other responsibilities and is unlikely to help them
much. That leaves it up to the rest of us, at a point in history so full of
unrealized potential, to urge all of our children to try harder rather than pat
them on the head and say they are fine where they are.

Educational CyberPlayGround: Nobel Prize winners, and IQ and the Wealth of...
We have a long way to go. IQ and the Wealth of Nations All
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Technology/securitycrisis2nobel.html
 
Educational CyberPlayGround: Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for...
The trouble was that the IQ was his only claim to fame: he
www.edu-cyberpg.com/IEC/IntelligenceReframed.html
 
Brain Based Learning, IQ and Brain Development from Educational CyberPlayGround™
Studies of brains have taught us that people with higher IQs do
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Teachers/brain.html
 
Educational CyberPlayGround: Email lowers your IQ.
are a greater threat to IQ and concentration than taking
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Internet/e-mail/iq.html
 
Brain Based Learning, Multiple Intelligence and Brain Development from...
They gauged intelligence by giving each child standard IQ tests
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Teachers/brain2.html
 
Learn about the Civilian Conservation Corps what "Functionally Illiterate Adults" ...
World IQ averages about 90, so the 50th percentile for
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Literacy/americanadults.asp
 
Gifted Education Resources about Gifted and talented students who are truly our...
to discriminate accurately at higher IQ levels, capable only of
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Teachers/gifted_children.html
 
New Teacher Resources and Training: Educational CyberPlayGround™
The year in which IQ is tested can make the difference between
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Teachers/newteacher.html
 
Is Intelligence Inherited Controversy.
Although many investigators study IQ or g as an operational
www.edu-cyberpg.com/Literacy/intelligence.asp

Sunday, January 25, 2009 8:57:09 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)    Disclaimer  |   |  Related posts:
The Bipartisan Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act Needs Your Support!
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters Native Village
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters Awards and Scholarships for Creative Teens
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters Education News Parents Can Us
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters reauthorizing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
[ECP] K-12 Newsletters ARRA education grants and their allocations