Wednesday, November 18, 2009
« The Bipartisan Breast Cancer Patient Pro... | Main | ESBI Phone Bill Scam  »

Announcement Google has entered the market for legal information with a free service that allows users to search a database of US laws and court rulings. The move could endanger long-established legal publishers such as Westlaw and LexisNexis. Users can choose to search 'legal opinions and journals' for information that they need. Though court rulings and laws in the US are not protected by copyright they are usually only available for comprehensive searching in paid-for services to which universities and law firms subscribe.

free full service

Starting today, we're enabling people everywhere to find and read full text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts using Google Scholar. You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. Casey), or by topics (like desegregation) or other queries that you are interested in. For example, go to Google Scholar, click on the "Legal opinions and journals" radio button, and try the query separate but equal. Your search results will include links to cases familiar to many of us in the U.S. such as Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, which explore the acceptablity of "separate but equal" facilities for citizens at two different points in the history of the U.S. But your results will also include opinions from cases that you might be less familiar with, but which have played an important role.

We think this addition to Google Scholar will empower the average citizen by helping everyone learn more about the laws that govern us all. To understand how an opinion has influenced other decisions, you can explore citing and related cases using the Cited by and Related articles links on search result pages. As you read an opinion, you can follow citations to the opinions to which it refers. You can also see how individual cases have been quoted or discussed in other opinions and in articles from law journals. Browse these by clicking on the "How Cited" link next to the case title. See, for example, the frequent citations for Roe v. Wade, for Miranda v. Arizona (the source of the famous Miranda warning) or for Terry v. Ohio (a case which helped to establish acceptable grounds for an investigative stop by a police officer).


"As many of us recall from our civics lessons in school, the United States is a common law country," said the blog. "That means when judges issue opinions in legal cases, they often establish precedents that will guide the rulings of other judges in similar cases and jurisdictions. Over time, these legal opinions build, refine and clarify the laws that govern our land. "For average citizens, however, it can be difficult to find or even read these landmark opinions. We think that's a problem: laws that you don't know about, you can't follow – or make effective arguments to change. Starting today, we're enabling people everywhere to find and read full text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts," said Acharya.

Acharya said that the research tool was design to help people who were not familiar with the structure of legal information to access it in an understandable way.

"We think this addition to Google Scholar will empower the average citizen by helping everyone learn more about the laws that govern us all," he said. "To understand how an opinion has influenced other decisions, you can explore citing and related cases using the Cited by and Related articles links on search result pages. As you read an opinion, you can follow citations to the opinions to which it refers. You can also see how individual cases have been quoted or discussed in other opinions and in articles from law journals."

Acharya acknowledged the work of other people who have worked to make legal information and research available to people on a cheap or free basis. Amongst those named is Joe Uri of BAILII, the British And Irish Legal Information Institute. It publishes UK and Ireland court rulings for free.

"We felt that if any judgments should be freed so that the public can have access to them it should be this core of judgments, which basically make up the judgment side of the common law system," he said. "It seems natural that a member of the public should be able to find out what that reasoning is, it shouldn't be cloaked in secrecy."

"As we worked to build this feature, we were struck by how readable and accessible these opinions are. Court opinions don't just describe a decision but also present the reasons that support the decision. In doing so, they explain the intricacies of law in the context of real-life situations," he said.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009 5:00:40 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)    Disclaimer  |   |  Related posts:
Gypsy Jazz and St. Patricks Day Celebrates Etymology of Jazz with
Irish American Crossroads Calendar Dan Cassidy Remembered Doug Martin Avatar Ensemble
Proof of Whole Food Fraud 365 food NOT ORGANIC from China
Womens History Month
Newest fad is Chatroulette
Glottal Opera