Friday, November 23, 2007
« 25 million exposed to risk of ID fraud i... | Main | United Nations Internet governance conf... »
More than 150 friends?!

The Wall Street Journal's "numbers guy," Carl Bialik <http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119518271549595364.html>, zoomed in on that number - 150 - which many reporters have cited as the limit to the number of personal contacts any human being could possibly sustain. This is when they're writing stories about the lengthy friends lists some teens have amassed in social sites. The 150 comes from the research of Robin Dunbar at Oxford University, "extrapolating from social groups in nonhuman primates and then crediting people with greater capacity because of our larger neocortex, the part of the brain used for conscious thought and language." Ah, got it. So we definitely can sustain more friendships than primates. But, actually, Dunbar himself, Bialik reports, believes that social sites "could 'in principle' allow users to push past the limit." To the professor, the real question is "whether those who keep ties to hundreds of people do so to the detriment of their closest
relationships - defined by Prof. Dunbar as those formed with people you turn to when in severe distress." Bialik cites another recent UK survey that found - no huge surprise - friendships really start offline, but "less-close friendships and acquaintanceships, however, also die offline, while the Web can help sustain them" [read the article for examples].

Friday, November 23, 2007 9:57:23 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Related posts:
Patricia Bruder Director of Research and Grants EIRC
First Women Computers
Multi Processor Computing 1924
FCC Begins to Resolve Mutually Exclusive Noncommercial FM Radio Applications
Lomax the Song Hunter Film on PBS
Bristol Palin, Levi Johnson, Govenor Sarah Palin

Friday, November 23, 2007 10:28:44 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Brock Read said 11 Sure, both MySpace and Facebook are social networks, and both are beloved by college students. But the two sites are hardly created equal--at least not in terms of the significantly different groups of students who tend to frequent them. Now Eszter Hargittai, an assistant professor of communication studies at Northwestern University, has shed some light on what sets MySpace partisans apart from Facebook fans. Her report, "Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites," published in the October edition of the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/index.html
argues that a student's race, ethnicity, and upbringing play import ant parts in predicting which online social networks he or she will join. Ms. Hargittai, an author of an earlier study of women's confidence in their Web-surfing skills, draws on the work of other social-network watchers. Several anecdotal reports have noted that MySpace and Facebook users seem to break down along social and class lines, and bloggers have chewed over the idea that social networks have created a new "digital divide." But the new study adds some empirical rigor to those observations. Ms. Hargittai surveyed more than 1,000 freshmen at the University of Illinois at Chicago, which has one of the nation's most ethnically diverse student bodies. White students tend to gravitate toward Facebook, she found, while Hispanic students are much likelier to have MySpace pages. Asian and Asian-American stude nts prefer Facebook, but they also use other social-networking sites, like Xanga and Friendster, that are less popular with other ethnic groups. Other issues are at play as well. Students whose parents have lower levels of schooling are likely to use MySpace, while students whose parents have more formal education lean toward Facebook. And students who live at home are much less likely to frequent social networks than are their classmates who live on the campus. What should campus officials take away from the study? Ms. Hargittai says the results show that online social networks evoke real-world communities and demographics. "Online actions and interactions cannot be seen as tabula rasa activities, independent of existing offline identities," she writes. "Rather, constraints on one's everyday life are reflected in online behavior, thereby limiting--for some more than others--the extent to which students from different backgrounds may interact with students not like themselves."
christine
Comments are closed.